Hi Author!
I'm already really excited about this, and I will love you for writing me any of the threesomes I'm requesting (especially since, beside the Eureka one, they don't seem to exist on the internet). So, this is mostly my bubbling over, because this time of year is always my excuse to ramble on about fic. Hopefully you'll find it useful!
This is the general part of the letter, and it covers the major points, if you want to stop reading here. I'll be putting up a second part that rambles on about my specific requests more later (this time of the year is also my excuse to ramble on about my fandoms), but, seriously, don't read that one unless you like meta and/or detailed prompts.
( Cut for people who don't need to read )
Stories/Recs
(I should probably mention that none of these (except the Eurekas) are precisely the threesomes I'm requesting, hence why I'm requesting them! They're mostly stories that have shaped my vision of the characters or fit that vision near-perfectly.)
Harry Potter:
Godric/Rowena/Salazar: Luna’s Passing Through Nature to Eternity,
Harry/Hermione/Padma:
Tortall: Kel/Neal/Yuki: Lyss’s waking dreams of snow. There is not enough fic in this fandom, and with my particular trouble finding fic that recognizes the importance of Kel’s relationships with both Neal and Yuki (try finding that on FFN), I do a pretty limited amount of reading.
Eureka: Allison/Jack/Nathan:
Also, this may not be evident from the stories recced above, but I like happy stories. A lot. Almost always, in fact. I just have trouble finding them sometimes.
David Weber - Safehold series
Dhoom 2
Tale of Genji aka Genji monogatari
Heather Alexander - Faerie Queen (song)
Saiunkoku Monogatari
Shakespeare - Cymbeline (I can't believe no one had ever nominated this...)
And I'm trusting that other people won't change their nominations of Honor Harrington and Alera, since I might want to request those. Oh, dear, requests are going to be so difficult. Oh, also,
In other news, I'm dithering about doing
In other, other news, I don't get religious fundamentalism. At all. (And apparently monotheistic religions don't actually have a monopoly on it.) I mean, I know intellectually that one can think there is one true answer, end of story, but the idea of forbidding other people room to argue and interpret and find their own right answers is just so opposed to everything I think. And I hate not understanding, because I know it's a blind spot, and it makes me wonder if this is my own version of that same trait. *sigh*
( Cut for further fury )
The Eureka Field Guide to Zombie Invasions by
It's Allison, Jack, and Nathan trapped inside SARAH during a zombie invasion, it's got flamethrowers (if only by proxy), Allison is in control and gets what she wants, and it's threesomey. What more can a girl ask for?
Read, read, read!
But, anyway, I, uh, kind of wrote an entry for Porn Battle VII, except for the fact that I can't write porn, so it's really more like R-rated sap. The prompt was Abigail/Jefferson, admire, but I have a nearly ironclad infidelity squick, so it turned into Abigail/Jefferson(/Adams). Someday, I am actually going to write a story that gets the three of them in bed together (they went from jealousy and flirting in the garden to that lovely family-togetherness of the balloon ascension, which alone would be enough to convince me, but there's more, and the ease with which I could write a ship manifesto about this is kind of frightening), but for now I have:
Title: In Paris (link to entry)
Fandom: John Adams (HBO miniseries)
Rating: R
Pairing: Abigail Adams/Thomas Jefferson(/John Adams)
Disclaimer: Um. The people probably belonged to themselves; these particular characterizations belong to HBO and the producers of the Adams miniseries and kind of David McCullough. Any way you cut it, not mine, not making money, etc.
( Abigail told herself it was Paris, these vast and private gardens in which they took daily walks... )
Here goes:
( Amara, Gaius, and Alera )
( Lee, Laurin, and The Worlds )
( Murasaki, Tō no Chūjō, and Heian Japan )
( LePic, Theisman, and Haven )
Dear, sweet...argh. I swear, modern (Meiji onward) Japanese fiction seems to toss the word "subtle" out the window. Or maybe it's not subtle. What's the word for when someone is kind of screwed-up, but the story doesn't directly focus upon it? Obliqueness? But that's not it either, because it's kind of oxymoronic: you can tell when someone wants to write a story about one thing and only that one thing, even if they approach it from an angle. (This is as opposed to starting with one idea and building it into something richer) And, okay, modern Japanese lit is reasonably subtle about approaching ideas, but they seem to do it by bludgeoning you over the head with the screwed-up-ness of the individual characters. So, if Tanizaki wants to write a story about 1920s Japan's America-philia, he does it by bludgeoning you with the sexual shenanagins of his perspective character in Naomi. The ideas are reasonably subtle (in comparison, at least); the characters are blatantly screwy. But, you know, sometimes I don't give a damn about the ideology. I want the characters, and people. should. be. subtle. No one is made up of one thing!
Aaand, the point of this is that he's now writing a novella explicitly based upon Genji, about a man with a serious Oedipal complex, which, really, we all know Genji had in spades. But Murasaki Shikibu manages to make that only one element in his character, among a whole lot more, and informed by the richness of his relationships to his entire world. This story is claustrophobic, obsessive, and seriously, derangedly ill. And, fine, that's valid, but it's not the only valid thing. It's not the only valid story to tell, and the Murasaki Shikibu-style stories, with all the splendor of many fully-drawn (though not psychoanalyzed--*cough*thankgod*cough*) characters interacting feel like they're gone.
How I miss them.
Squee! Thank you for agreeing to write a story for me. I'm honestly equally enthusiastic about all four of these fandoms and you could count the fic for all four of them put together on the fingers on one hand, so any story will make me so veryvery happy.
On that note, please believe me when I say my prompts are just to get you thinking. A story about any of them would make me ecstatic, but if you have a plot bunny that you’d love to write, I know I’d love to read it. I think I might have scared my author off last year, so I want to emphasize this a lot. You're writing this fandom (I hope!) because you love it as much as I do, and a story coming out of that will be awesome.
And now, on to fandom-specific babble.
( Honorverse )
( Stealing the Elf-King's Roses )
( Alera )
( Tale of Genji )
Huh. In retrospect, all of the prompts except the Genji one have a common thread of "They love their jobs, they're kick-ass at their jobs, and hopefully they can fit in a life around their jobs, but the job comes first." Which could be a source of angst, but, really, doesn't have to be, and the characters already know that (Lee!) or really ought to (re)discover it (*cough*Amara*cough*). I'm now wondering what this says about me.
EDIT: I might have gone into analytical mode while writing this. If I did and it sounds like I dislike everything, I'm really, really sorry, and will try to fix that by creating a post by this weekend of all of the giggly squee that got cut out of this thing for length. I'm spending too much time in academia. Sorry!
EDIT2: Here be happiness!
Yes! All of our killing ourselves over the Obama campaign, nagging friends and family members to vote, volunteer, donate, do more... It was all worth it!
Also, I'm so proud of Connecticut for saying "hell, no" on the constitutional convention. I'm worried about California, but at least we won't be having any right-wing loony anti-marriage propositions sitting on our next ballot. And Bridgeport went Democrat. HappyHappyHappy!
ETA: Damn. My mother's from Florida, and she didn't even tell me that an anti-gay marriage amendment was on the Florida ballot. And then it passed. And so did Prop 8. Why did two of the largest states, both of whom voted for Obama, feel the need write discrimination into their core legal texts?
Honestly, though, when I'm in the right mood, it's actually hilarious. I can giggle hysterically over the fact that you can tell what history he's reading (i.e., whoever the next "major world power" seems to be), based on the allusions (and the names! oh, the names!) in his books. So even his historical allusion are really not the problem.
( The problem is... )
By the way, if anyone reads this and ever gets the chance to see the Marcus Goodwin adaptation of Pride and Prejudice, go. Immediately. The script doesn't read particularly well (duh, if you're just reading, you might as well reread P&P) but wow does a good performance make you go back and think about the original.
( See, if I write a paper... )
So, that was long, and should have been written way before it grew into a mini-essay. Unfortunately, 12 hours a day in the theater doing lighting doesn't leave much time for random reflections. I need to write about that, too, before I forget enough to get myself into it again this term. Mental note, Maat: you need a break.
Now, all of this is coming from my growing interest in slashing Genji and his best friend/brother-in-law/rival/etc Tō no Chūjō, and one of the nicest things about Genji-canon is that everything in it is so very discreet that often the same descriptions attach to historically acknowledged affairs (they "talked all night") as do to two friends hanging out together. I can't say I actually believe at this point that Genji and his best friend were sleeping together regularly, but I can certainly believe they experimented together. I also, as a mostly separate character observation, think Tō no Chūjō puts more into the friendship than Genji does, because Genji inspires people to pour their souls into him, and he never (with the possible exception of Murasaki) gives quite that much back.
So, I have one character (Genji) who is constantly searching for something (which scholars have variously seen as love, intimacy, a replacement for the mother he lost, etc), who regularly uses substitutes for it, and who, moreover, uses romantic/erotic relations with males as substitutes for such relations with females. Then I have another character (Tō no Chūjō) who doesn't seem to feel the need to go searching for much, especially romantically, who doesn't sleep with men, who has fairly good reason to be ticked off at Genji's amorous escapades, considering Genji is ignoring his sister to sleep with (among others) his mistress, but who seems attached to Genji anyway. So how would Tō no Chūjō react if his friendly and filial feelings for Genji started shading in towards the romantic? He knows Genji well enough to know that Genji sees men as substitutes. He also knows Genji enough to know that Genji frequently needs substitutes, since his affairs are ridiculously complicated. Unfortunately for his sanity, when Genji throws himself wholeheartedly into pursuing anyone, even a substitute, it's rather hard to remember that one is a substitute and Genji will be moving on.
It's a fascinating situation (or story idea) that wouldn't happen in modern American culture, when so many of our fandoms are set, because we make same-sex (especially male/male) interest so very inconvenient, but I really, really want to see it. I'm also terribly tempted to write it, which is difficult, since I don't even know Tō no Chūjō's name (that appellation, the conventional one, is just a title, Secretary Captain) or Genji's given name, for that matter. But, oh, it would be fascinating to explore in fic rather than papers.
( Owning Light )
Incidentally, I love Shakespeare. Very, very much.
I'm supposed to be writing a paper about Donne's love poem "A Valediction of the Book," which is gorgeous and definitely on my top-five Donne poems list, but I can't think of anything useful to say about it. It's pretty; he's obviously comparing love-letters to the Bible (which is one of the best conceits ever), but why, oh why, did I decide to make a paper about it? (Oh, yeah, because nothing about Donne makes an easy paper) And I want it to be good, because I really like this professor--one of her research/teaching areas is Gawain and the Green Knight and she studies Norse mythology peripherally and has a truly endearing love for Chaucer. But none of this is making the blasted poem any more analyzable. Grr.
ETA: Finished, handed in, and graded. I took a bit of a depressing stance on the poem, which my professor apparently disagreed with. Which rather sucks, since I thought it was a good analysis. Hopefully it'll make for a good discussion when I talk to her about it.
http://www.luminarium.org/
It has all of the obscure people that my textbook mentioned, but my college library only has in really old books where the s's look like f's. (which is developing into a major pet peeve as I try to read one)
As a side note, I was terribly amused to discover that the Restoration rewritten version of King Lear has a romance between Cordelia and Edgar where they wind up happily married at the end. That, unfortunately, is not on Luminarium, but it is here, under the adapter, Nahum Tate, and I'm having so much fun reading it.




